YamaPA
New Member
Exactly. The OP is turning off the TC only, not the ABS.japako said:Sound to me like your just turning off Traction Control, not ABS.
Our bikes do the same thing. Unless I'm missing something.
Exactly. The OP is turning off the TC only, not the ABS.japako said:Sound to me like your just turning off Traction Control, not ABS.
Our bikes do the same thing. Unless I'm missing something.
YamaPA said:Exactly. The OP is turning off the TC only, not the ABS.
Yep, this only turns off the Traction Control. ABS is still active.rem said:Ditto for Canadian bikes. R ::024::
Have to agree with Ray here - having done some roadracing in the distant past, I find the Super Tenere doesn't work that well for me when I try to ride it like a sport bike. Brakes lack feel, tires (currently K60's) don't offer much grip or feel, turn-in is slow, ground clearance is lacking. Which is all to be expected - it would be nice if the bike did everything perfectly, but being a sport bike was not in the design brief. As Ray says, this bike is all about taking care of normal riders and getting to the end of the day safely. If that's not exciting enough, they may choose to ride in tougher terrain than they'd normally take on, and the bike will still look after them.Old Git Ray said:Whilst I have to bow down to some comments on here by ex/current racers, I do have to ask myself why they bought this bike in the first place. To my mind it was designed to aimed at the masses of normal riders who ultimately prefer to go out play and still be able to ride the bike home at the end of the day, or use it for adventurous touring where getting to the end of the day still in the saddle was paramount. This it does very very well, but as for cutting edge riding, I do not think the bike was designed for that.
While I agree that the S10's ABS is desirable to be on in all but a very limited set of circumstances, it takes some convoluted logic to conclude that the lack of a switch is a plus by protecting ourselves from possibly turning it off when it should be on. With a switch, those that think it is desirable to leave on all the time simply don't use the switch. There is no takeaway with a switch (other than cost of course).Old Git Ray said:One of the big things about not having an off switch is that if you do use it off road with the ABS turned off and then drive onto the road with muddy tyres and some twat in a cage pulls out in front of you, you are in the shit big time. If the ABS had been on all the time the bike will have just stopped and not fallen over when you grabbed the front brake. It does not care what surface you are on. It is not valhallah but it's close.
And the fact that it works is reason enough to leave it alone (and ON)!Tiger_one said:It is very complex with some very interesting calculations, such as applying brakes differently (more aggressive) when 2up. Pretty interesting technology to say the least.
I don't think so - I know I'm an idiot, so I would probably turn it off when I don't need to, just because I can. Then I'd leave the section where I thought I needed to turn off the ABS and probably didn't, forget to turn it back on, see a nice corner and go steaming into it as normal, find myself unable to control my braking (anything like) as well as the ABS does, and crash.markjenn said:While I agree that the S10's ABS is desirable to be on in all but a very limited set of circumstances, it takes some convoluted logic to conclude that the lack of a switch is a plus by protecting ourselves from possibly turning it off when it should be on.
If you know ahead of time you're an "idiot", then you know ahead of time to simply never turn the ABS off. Again, anybody who thinks the ABS is better left on all the time can simply not use the switch. So this "less is more" logic still escapes me. Perhaps Yamaha should remove the choice of the engine making 90 hp and instead limit it to 50 so you won't be an idiot and use too much power too.dcstrom said:I don't think so - I know I'm an idiot, so I would probably turn it off when I don't need to, just because I can. Then I'd leave the section where I thought I needed to turn off the ABS and probably didn't, forget to turn it back on, see a nice corner and go steaming into it as normal, find myself unable to control my braking (anything like) as well as the ABS does, and crash.
The point I'm trying to make is that Yamaha decided that on this bike, with this ABS system, most people would be better off, most of the time, without an "ABS off" option. I agree with them. For anyone who feels the need to turn it off, the fix is either cheap ($50 or so for a switch) or free (running on the centerstand in gear, or pull the fuse) depending on the level of convenience required.markjenn said:If you know ahead of time you're an "idiot", then you know ahead of time to simply never turn the ABS off. Again, anybody who thinks the ABS is better left on all the time can simply not use the switch. So this "less is more" logic still escapes me. Perhaps Yamaha should remove the choice of the engine making 90 hp and instead limit it to 50 so you won't be an idiot and not use too much power too.
- Mark
I agree that most riders are better off most of the time with the ABS left on. But that doesn't mean that the bike wouldn't be better with the option to turn it off when "most" doesn't fit the situation.dcstrom said:The point I'm trying to make is that Yamaha decided that on this bike, with this ABS system, most people would be better off, most of the time, without an "ABS off" option. I agree with them. For anyone who feels the need to turn it off, the fix is either cheap ($50 or so for a switch) or free (running on the centerstand in gear, or pull the fuse) depending on the level of convenience required.
It is apparent that, despite 12 months worth of data being available on the web for you to make an informed choice, you bought the wrong bike. Thats what free choice does for you.YamaPA said:Man, the way some of you guys talk about ABS and how great it is and that everyone should just keep the ABS "ON" makes me wonder if you work for the govt's safety police, govt's fun removal team or for the removal of free choice foundation.
Next year I supposed you will be pushing for airbags, heated mirrors, self darkening shields, headsup displays, tire pressure monitors, self retracting sidestands, autoshift, automatic deploying of stabilzer wheels, antiwheelie devices (shit, we already have that with each new start of the bike in TC1 mode....why cant it remember where I set it the last time I used the bike...oh, that's right...it's for my own safety!), etc. It's a freaking motorcycle for Pete's sake. It's supposed to be fun, dangerous and exciting.
Are any of you guys complaining about reduced power in the first three gears? If so, stop it, it doesnt fit with a pro-ABS stance.
People that grew up dirt riding, like dirt riding, and ride dirt well, dislike the fact that with ABS you can't EFFECTIVELY setup the rear end of the bike for corners exits by skidding the rear wheel and it just doesnt work well on surfaces which do not consist of a "high" traction surface. If ABS works for you...great. If you like ABS...great. If someone wants help disconnecting ABS.....either lend the help or saying nothing. It's a personal choice. Just leave it at that. Discussions of ABS are as bad as oil or tire threads these days.
Whether an ABS switch is better suited to the 2% of extreme situations some riders might choose to put themselves in is of no concern to Yamaha. Those riders will ultimately find a practical way to disable the ABS, or they will sell the machine. No big deal for Yamaha, as that type of rider on a bike this size and purpose is very small in number. Yamaha loses very little in sales while keeping its legal ass covered concerning impending legislation that will make ABS mandatory. Further, and to that end, they have developed what is currently the most effective off road ABS on the planet. Which way will the thrill seekers run when the laws are implemented?.... Same direction some of us go in search of more power, if we want it bad enough...and why do you imply that it's irony to want more power while still wanting something that will slow down the resulting speed in a safe manner in most any situation?YamaPA said:Man, the way some of you guys talk about ABS and how great it is and that everyone should just keep the ABS "ON" makes me wonder if you work for the govt's safety police, govt's fun removal team or for the removal of free choice foundation.
Next year I supposed you will be pushing for airbags, heated mirrors, self darkening shields, headsup displays, tire pressure monitors, self retracting sidestands, autoshift, automatic deploying of stabilzer wheels, antiwheelie devices (shit, we already have that with each new start of the bike in TC1 mode....why cant it remember where I set it the last time I used the bike...oh, that's right...it's for my own safety!), etc. It's a freaking motorcycle for Pete's sake. It's supposed to be fun, dangerous and exciting.
Are any of you guys complaining about reduced power in the first three gears? If so, stop it, it doesnt fit with a pro-ABS stance.
People that grew up dirt riding, like dirt riding, and ride dirt well, dislike the fact that with ABS you can't EFFECTIVELY setup the rear end of the bike for corners exits by skidding the rear wheel and it just doesnt work well on surfaces which do not consist of a "high" traction surface. If ABS works for you...great. If you like ABS...great. If someone wants help disconnecting ABS.....either lend the help or saying nothing. It's a personal choice. Just leave it at that. Discussions of ABS are as bad as oil or tire threads these days.
To me, that's the biggest "danger" of the ABS off-road... it gives me such a confidence-boost that I end up going way faster than I would otherwise... it's unbelievable how fast it can knock off speed on a loose surface.~TABASCO~ said:One could argue I was going to fast... true, but the ABS allowed to me to keep complete control off road at speed.