fredz43
Well-Known Member
Founding Member
2011 Site Supporter
2012 Site Supporter
2013 Site Supporter
2014 Site Supporter
Anybody recall how many liters the Yamaha bags are?
Sorry, I've not used them two up. But if the mounting points, for the upcoming Super Tenere wolfman racks are placed anything like they are on other bikes, there will be room for two up riding. And if you use the D-ring loops that wolfman offers, to mount the saddlebags to other manufacturres racks like SW-Motech, surely they will be out of the way because they are much smaller than the hard panniers. The wolfman saddlebags are around 19L each, so significantly smaller than hardbags. They are a great option for offroard riding, in my opinion, and/or for lighter trips. I plan on choosing the largest pannier option since I'll have the saddlebags for offroad and lighter trips and the panniers for long road trips.spklbuk said:@ Chadx - How do you think the Wolfman Expedition saddle bags would work with a pillion 2-up?
I linked to them on the other thread, but here is a copy...johnpitts01 said:Does anyone know how the mounts shown in the TT video will be for the Super Tenere? Will they use the passenger footpegs as a mounting point for the brackets?
They disappeared from the website last week. I inquired and got a polite reply from Twisted Throttle saying Micatech questions and order fulfillment can be done directly through the Micatechs website. I don't know what happened, but not really any of my business and that reply told me all I needed to know. Twisted Throttle no longer sells Micatech. Always a shame when there are fewer vendor/retail choices.Hipshot said:I can't find the Micatech cases on the Twisted Throttle web site. Did they drop the line?
Great explanation.twistedthrottle said:SW-MOTECH racks are built to be as close to the bike as possible on both sides. This means SW-MOTECH's racks are slightly assymetrical. Givi usually makes racks symmetrical, which tends to space at least one case further from the center line of the bike than it really needs to be.
Just get whichever one you like better and will be happier with. $98 doesn't seem too significant on a $13,000 bike with probably $1,000 - $3,000 wort of add ons. The worst part would be when you look at something, for years to come, and think to yourself "I settled for that". You want to look at your choice, even if it's the cheaper one, and think "I got what was the best choice for me and got exactly what I wanted". Shop accordingly. ...even if that means putting off another farkle just a bit longer.colorider said:I just went through the numbers and the SW-MOTECH setup (when used for Givi bags) will be $98 more than the Givi mounts. This include the shipping cost that I would not incur if buying Givi.
Chadx said:Sorry, I've not used them two up. But if the mounting points, for the upcoming Super Tenere wolfman racks are placed anything like they are on other bikes, there will be room for two up riding. And if you use the D-ring loops that wolfman offers, to mount the saddlebags to other manufacturres racks like SW-Motech, surely they will be out of the way because they are much smaller than the hard panniers. The wolfman saddlebags are around 19L each, so significantly smaller than hardbags. They are a great option for offroard riding, in my opinion, and/or for lighter trips. I plan on choosing the largest pannier option since I'll have the saddlebags for offroad and lighter trips and the panniers for long road trips.
Yeah, that's the conclusion I came to last night. There are some advantages to the Givi setup - mainly if you want that space for either a tool tube or spare fuel container, but I decided I prefer the close mount setup. I will go with a 33L Trekker on the left and a 46L Trekker on the right, mounted on SW-MOTECH racks. The Trekkers are on order and I will have them mid Feb, but I still need to pull the trigger on the mounts/adapters.Chadx said:Just get whichever one you like better and will be happier with. $98 doesn't seem too significant on a $13,000 bike with probably $1,000 - $3,000 wort of add ons. The worst part would be when you look at something, for years to come, and think to yourself "I settled for that". You want to look at your choice, even if it's the cheaper one, and think "I got what was the best choice for me and got exactly what I wanted". Shop accordingly. ...even if that means putting off another farkle just a bit longer.
I want to be able to reuse the Pelican cases from my DL1000 so I need the symmetrical rack. Running the other setup doesn't make you narrower or more maneuverable since you are going to run a wider case on one side of the bike. And actually, since that case is larger you are likely to carry more stuff in it making the bike less maneuverable.Chadx said:Great explanation.
Honestly, I don't understood why one would want a rack that stuck out further than needed. All that wasted space left open or for just a small tube or something seems a waste and it works against you in so many ways. I guess it's mainly a looks thing that decides it for most people. For me, I want it as functional as possible, and that means as narrow as possible for trail work, city traffic, and garage maneuvering. And even though it doesn't impact mass centralization too much, it does a bit. Every few inches inward that the weight is carried, there will be some benefit.
So, it's the close fitting racks (like the SW-motech) for me. Likely, the Micatech V2 for hard cases. The right side will be the larger 45L (10"). I haven't decided if the exhaust side will be a smaller 37L (8") pannier or the 45L (10"). But that will be decided strictly on if I think I need the carrying capacity and not on how it looks from behind. Since I'll have the Wolfman Expeditiion Dry Saddlebags for light trips, I'll probably go with two 45L for max capacity when running errands or on long road trips.
By your response, I might not have been clear in my description. I have always intended on running the big case on the right side, so if the rack has an unnecessary 4"+ gap, it actually will make the case stick out 4"+ further than a rack designed to sit in tight against the bike. So pannier capacity being equal, the narrower rack will, of course, make the overall width narrower and carry the weight more centered.Rick said:Running the other setup doesn't make you narrower or more maneuverable since you are going to run a wider case on one side of the bike. And actually, since that case is larger you are likely to carry more stuff in it making the bike less maneuverable.
Yamaha's letter describing the accessory packages says 32L per side.fredz43 said:Anybody recall how many liters the Yamaha bags are?
Hmmmm ... that needs a little more consideration ... the nearside box is indented to accommodate the zorst can ... not much but definitely less volume.markjenn said:.... Yamaha's letter describing the accessory packages says 32L per side ....
Sounds about right for the left side, but the right side looks to be quite a bitl larger - perhaps more like 40L.Swagger said:Hmmmm ... that needs a little more consideration ... the nearside box is indented to accommodate the zorst can ... not much but definitely less volume.
I would have never thought they were that small. I'm also surprised the muffler cutout only reduces the volume by 3L.switchback said:P/N - ABA-23PKT-SE-03
Description Retail
Aluminum Side Case 29 Liter - Left $ 449.95
Aluminum Side Case 32 Liter - Right $ 449.95
From Yamaha's website. I also thought they were larger.
Fred, perhaps you did not see my earlier post on the racks, but the GIVI rack does NOT mount close on the right hand side, but instead has a large space, approximately equal distance, as the left side. It will look the same as a DL650 and would provide a space for a tool tube or whatever on the non-exhaust side. With this configuration, you would most likely want the same size bag on both sides.fredz43 said:I am looking forward to checking out the Trekkers next month in Indy. I see that amotostuff.com has decent prices on them. The combo of a 33L + 46L plus quick disconnect racks is about $820. The pics of the racks for these look as though they fit at least as close to the bike as the SW Motec racks.
The Trax look decent, but I have seem some pics on advrider showing that they are not waterproof, perhaps due to the riveted? construction. Also the aluminum interior is not what I prefer. Still undecided and looking forward to seeing more products in person before purchasing.