Called this one in today. View attachment 97649
Called this one in today. View attachment 97649
And I that's what I was expecting. But I've had all of those, plus armadillos and racoons on film . . . . and nothing goes near the squirrels. The other day I went out to grab the latest squirrel carcass. And found just the scalp, the back skin, and tail. Everything else was gone. The day after that the skin was gone too. Whatever is taking them has a cloaking device. I'm thinking Predator that eats like a Cajun.. . . . Same deal, something was cleaning them up. I put out a trail camera and saw cats, dogs, foxes and opossum carrying them off. . . .
It works fine and I can get OK groups but the trigger is SO dead and long to pull until it releases on the first shot that it's always sort of a surprise when it is nearly fully pulled and the gun finally fires. The Smith M&P trigger action spoiled me, but then mine's a competition model and lighter than generic ones. The release for the following shots of the Kahr are much more predictable. The other thing is that the single stack grip is so flat and small that my hand is crunched up holding it and the knuckle of my middle finger chafes on the guard.Triggers. No that's a whole 'nuther topic. Almost an oil thread. What didn't you like about the Kahr?
Actually, the Kahr is pretty much a straight "double action". While most other striker-fired guns pre-cock the striker when the action cycles, the Kahrs do not. The feel is similar to a very smooth double action revolver: long, relatively heavy pull with no discernible break and the reset is all the way out at the beginning of the travel again......you either love it or you hate it. (I love my CM-9 but it's definitly a different trigger to learn as compared to every other striker-fired pistol.)Sounds like the Kahr is a double/single action trigger. First pull is a long/normal pull. Following shots are single action like a 1911.
My take down lever keeps rusting. I sweat a lot.It's an EDC, needs a cleaning from the looks of it.
The CW9 is my carry gun. I find it reliable, fairly accurate, and uninspiring. Nothing wrong with it. Nothing to get excited about. Don't have anything negative to say about the trigger.Anybody here have personal experience with both a Kahr CW9 and Sig P365? Have the Kahr and never been really happy with the trigger so am interested in the Sig.
I have a P365 too. Nice gun, a bit heavier and bulkier than the single stack Kahr so I don't carry it as much. Accurate and a good trigger. My thumb tends to ride the slide lock on the Sig causing it to not lock back on an empty chamber....annoys the crap out of me. Mine's an early model but never experienced any of the initial firing pin breakage issues.Anybody here have personal experience with both a Kahr CW9 and Sig P365? Have the Kahr and never been really happy with the trigger so am interested in the Sig.
Sounds like you're describing the Tenere again.. . . . I find it reliable, fairly accurate, and uninspiring. Nothing wrong with it. Nothing to get excited about. Don't have anything negative to say . . . .
Thanks for the personal experience.I have a P365 too. Nice gun, a bit heavier and bulkier than the single stack Kahr so I don't carry it as much. Accurate and a good trigger. My thumb tends to ride the slide lock on the Sig causing it to not lock back on an empty chamber....annoys the crap out of me. Mine's an early model but never experienced any of the initial firing pin breakage issues.
I remember us talking about our CW9s and generally agree with the the " reliable, fairly accurate, and uninspiring" bit. It's just one of those guns that's never been quite right to me but not enough to move on from and after shooting it recently I'm back to thinking.The CW9 is my carry gun. I find it reliable, fairly accurate, and uninspiring. Nothing wrong with it. Nothing to get excited about. Don't have anything negative to say about the trigger.
DM has the Sig P232. It's only a 380, but it's a VERY nice gun. If that's an example of Sig quality, then I expect good things.
LOLSounds like you're describing the Tenere again.
The 300 Blackout was actually developed for the military. It was made to work on the M4 platform with only having to change the barrel. Everything else remains the same. It was made to work with sub sonic rounds and a suppressor. I'm guessing it's much quieter than a suppressed 5.56. I will have to look at some ballistic charts, but I can't imagine a 220 grain bullet at less than 1100 feet per second having much range. Of course it can use ammo that is not sub sonic and the sub sonic ammo that I have seen is 220 grain. Probably work on hogs at close range, but I agree, I'll take a .308 every time.I'm pretty sure that .300 Blackout was designed specifically for feral hogs. Never really understood the why. No need to reinvent the wheel. .308 will do just about anything you need it to at a much greater range. And depending on where you get your ammo .300 and .308 are similar in cost per.
OPINION: Inside 300yds, 5.56 is my go-to. (at 400yds, it's starting to drop like a rock) Past 300yds, or larger/heavier targets I reach for the .308. They both have variable power scopes with BDCs.
I have the M1 Garand, but it's more of an heirloom or "fun gun" than first choice gun. It has the period correct fixed 10x scope.