mrpete64 said:
It is so good now can one "really" tell the difference between a pair of speakers that cost $85,000 or $5,000.
Pffft! $85K!! What a tight wad..
http://www.cnet.com/au/news/the-1000000-speaker/
You can hear the difference between two $85,000 sets of speakers. One of them might be really accurate and some people like that, and the other may have a bit of "character" and some might like that. At $85,000 you never get too much character though. They will both be tending toward accurate, well most of them anyway.
But just as the Audio world went into nuts territory with 2000W per channel amplifiers and porked up on gadgets galore like 20 band graphic equalizers, by the end of the 70's most people settled down into plastic fantastic all in ones or more refined and bare 100W per channel quality stuff.
Eventually, by the 2000's the quality stuff was starting to become poser stuff though. Now it's getting stupid again...
For a mere $480,000 dollars (on special this month only) you can buy this little beauty. 19,500 Watt three phase power required because you need 19,500 Watts and 12 channels these days right? I mean what else are the Billionaires going to spend their money on? Helping the poor or something?
Just the thing you need to drive those cheap passive $85,000 dollar loudspeakers you bought 12 of.
One day KAWASAKI will put the 320HP H2R motor into a trail bike and that will be the new normal.