kmac
Kelly kmac
So just a curiosity for me, For those of you who have had the Tenere apart and seen all of the under belly, what would you say is the cause of the substantial weight?
Not complaining about the weight and I think the weight is completely livable for me, but what causes it?
I mean if you were to take say an R1 as a comparison. I know, completely different animal, but, a 4 cylinder engine vs a 2 cylinder...in theory the 2 cylinder could be lighter than the 4 because of the narrower crank, 2 less rods/pistons and valve train. I am aware that the bore and stroke of the 2 cylinder is obviously larger making each piston/rod and crank heavier, but having less of them at the very least SHOULD offset. The gear box is potentially the same weight. Both bikes have inverted forks, shock and seat. Headlight and gauges....you get the point.
So there is obviously a few pounds in the shaft and FD and swingarm over the sport bike chain drive and light hollow SA, there is a few. 2 extra gallons of fuel. there is 14 lbs...so lets add 25 lbs for fuel and drive systems. The frame is aluminum on the R1 as opposed to the steel of the Super T...maybe a couple pounds, but KTM has shown that a steel frame does not mean heavy as all of the Asian MX bikes now have aluminum frames and KTM has a ChroMo steel frame and is the lightest of all of the MX usually....so steel vs aluminum frame could be a mute point also.
R1 = 477 curb weight and the Ten is 578. Given the 25 lbs for fuel and SA/drive, where does the other 75 lbs come from?
How does the big beastly bmw gs/gsa with a large counter balancer, very heavy fork/telelever control arm, separate full shock and ball joint front end and 2 more gallons of fuel still beat the Super Ten in tonnage?
Not complaining about the weight and I think the weight is completely livable for me, but what causes it?
I mean if you were to take say an R1 as a comparison. I know, completely different animal, but, a 4 cylinder engine vs a 2 cylinder...in theory the 2 cylinder could be lighter than the 4 because of the narrower crank, 2 less rods/pistons and valve train. I am aware that the bore and stroke of the 2 cylinder is obviously larger making each piston/rod and crank heavier, but having less of them at the very least SHOULD offset. The gear box is potentially the same weight. Both bikes have inverted forks, shock and seat. Headlight and gauges....you get the point.
So there is obviously a few pounds in the shaft and FD and swingarm over the sport bike chain drive and light hollow SA, there is a few. 2 extra gallons of fuel. there is 14 lbs...so lets add 25 lbs for fuel and drive systems. The frame is aluminum on the R1 as opposed to the steel of the Super T...maybe a couple pounds, but KTM has shown that a steel frame does not mean heavy as all of the Asian MX bikes now have aluminum frames and KTM has a ChroMo steel frame and is the lightest of all of the MX usually....so steel vs aluminum frame could be a mute point also.
R1 = 477 curb weight and the Ten is 578. Given the 25 lbs for fuel and SA/drive, where does the other 75 lbs come from?
How does the big beastly bmw gs/gsa with a large counter balancer, very heavy fork/telelever control arm, separate full shock and ball joint front end and 2 more gallons of fuel still beat the Super Ten in tonnage?