eemsreno
Well-Known Member
Founding Member
2011 Site Supporter
2012 Site Supporter
2013 Site Supporter
2014 Site Supporter
We are near Buena Vista in these pictures.
If you are going to spend the money on dyno time I think I'd spend the money on a Power Commander also...Firefight911 said:Interesting, the 5th number determines switch point from cruise to acceleration. This, in my understanding of how the controller works, does not come in to play at WOT.
I am very sensitive to lean/rich. I am positive I was lean on 2nd number as my performance improved whenever I allowed the temp to get above 200 degrees. Hot and lean improvement. Once I bumped 2nd number to 5 I saw an immediate improvement. It is well known that WOT is running rich by standard programming on the ECU. That's why 3rd number is 0.5. This translates to stock ECU programming.
HighFive on ADV did some extensive dyno work and mods that I emulated in some areas - http://www.wrrdualsport.com/
I really am looking forward to my own dyno time though. There's no substitute for it.
As for pics, I will get my act together soon and get a proper build post done. In the mean time, I have the bulk/raw photos of everything here - http://firefight911.smugmug.com/Motorcycles/WR250R/
I've never been asked if my tires were DOT by law enforcement and the guy that inspects the bike could give a rip so... my 520 EXC has MX52's front (w/TuBliss) and rear and seem to be wearing well but I am very easy with them on pavement. I used the Michelin MH3 once before and found it to be a good all around tire (not great for sand) but if you use it on extended pavement runs you will see rapid wear. The tire I get the most life out of is the Maxxis Desert IT.trikepilot said:Had a bad experience or three last weekend in the slop on a 75% work out Michelin T63 rear tire. Was gonna just get a D606 but then thought about the not DOT options. I have never been stopped and asked if my tires are DOT approved and my current front is not anyway. So why not run a non-compliant rear, eh?
I strolled around a few sites and liked the look/cost of this one - Michelin StarCross MH3.
Does anyone have any thoughts on a favorite non DOT approved knobby? Road performance is irrelevant to me.
I've found M63s are pretty good in mud. What pressure were you running, that can make a difference.trikepilot said:Had a bad experience or three last weekend in the slop on a 75% work out Michelin T63 rear tire. Was gonna just get a D606 but then thought about the not DOT options. I have never been stopped and asked if my tires are DOT approved and my current front is not anyway. So why not run a non-compliant rear, eh?
I strolled around a few sites and liked the look/cost of this one - Michelin StarCross MH3.
Does anyone have any thoughts on a favorite non DOT approved knobby? Road performance is irrelevant to me.
For the rear: Kenda Trakmaster IItrikepilot said:Had a bad experience or three last weekend in the slop on a 75% work out Michelin T63 rear tire. Was gonna just get a D606 but then thought about the not DOT options. I have never been stopped and asked if my tires are DOT approved and my current front is not anyway. So why not run a non-compliant rear, eh?
I strolled around a few sites and liked the look/cost of this one - Michelin StarCross MH3.
Does anyone have any thoughts on a favorite non DOT approved knobby? Road performance is irrelevant to me.
It's not too difficult to install rim locks. I put two Motion Pro locks in the front and rear of my WR. Never a problem. Even on that day you and I did all those water crossings and you heard through the bluetooth me doing my best to make the tire separate from the rim. Never a issue.trikepilot said:There are two holes with rubber plugs on the OEM rear rim for the WRR so it should not be a difficult install. Just need to get by the shop to grab a rimlock but that will have to wait till after the holidays.