I have a set coming and found these prices when researching the other day:
I mounted these for Swampy. As with all Michelins, an absolute dream to mount and balance. Looked like a nice tire. I think I'll try it next once I burn through my old-school Tourances (non-EXP) on the trip to TX.swampyvt said:After 400 miles on them I'm happy. They definitely ride nicer on the highway. And like stated above they are much better on a dirt road then I expected them to be. After riding NJ to Texas for the race I may have more info on mileage etc.
Sent from my XT907 using Tapatalk 2
Dallara said:~
Just curious, ChecksWrecks...
Where did you find the info from Michelin stating that the H-rated Anakee 3's had a harder rubber compound than the V-rated ones?
Thanks!
Dallara
~
Checkswrecks said:Fair question & the answer is that I learned it from another company, then confirmed it a couple of times.
I've done a number of tire investigations for a long time, but in 2008 we worked real close with a tire company on a SC Learjet accident that resulted after loss of all four main tires. The runway is in the background and no tires = no brakes, plus they lost the engine reverser function. We collected a half mile of tire debris that became 4 jigsaw puzzles to figure out and be able to prove what happened. (low initial tire pressure)
The tire company makes a LOT of tires for all sorts of vehicles and we were in a development center with a lot of very experienced tire people. It was like a toy shop and class in one place and I was under the impression about H tires lasting longer so asked. (Since then seen the same on forums and this had nothing to do with airplanes.)
As explained originally about CAR tires, the higher ratings need to be able to stop faster and handle at higher speeds, hence the softer compound. I also found that the FMVSS 119 standards for motorcycles use similar environmental conditions that are imposed on cars. Since then, some highway investigators I know have said the same thing as what I heard at the tire company.