EricV said:
If that were true, you'd know that engineers spend a lot of time in CYA mode, just as manufacturers do. I've also spent decades working in manufacturing at different levels. I've seen engineers refuse to change designs even when proven that they don't work. I've seen companies willing to accept loss, as long as it's cheaper than re-tooling or heaven forbid, issuing a recall or safety warning notice.
What a shame you've only worked in areas where the "CYA mode" was all there was. Fortunately I've worked in areas where engineers aren't the slightest bit interested in "CYA mode", and all they were doing was trying to produce the absolute highest performance product possible within the state of the art.
EricV said:
You've been involved in testing for car tires, on cars. How much experience do you have testing car tires on motorcycles? None, I would guess. I on the other hand, have first hand, personal experience actually doing it. I know what it's like and how it works. You propose that you have a clue. You don't. You can't see out side the box.
I've been involved in testing car tires, on cars that lap some ovals at over 230 MPH... And with some of the best tire development engineers in the country.
You've done some garage dabbling in putting a car tire on a motorcycle and tooling around on it for 70,000 miles. That's not "engineering". It's also not actual "testing", because true "testing" involves not just approaching what you think the limits of something are, but also exceeding them so you can well and truly determine those limits. If you really won't exceed the posted speed limit on roadways by 20 MPH or more then you are no were near approaching the limits of any tires relevant to this discussion, nor getting anywhere near the limits of the motorcycle germane, either.
Unless you've run one of those car tires into failure on your motorcycle then you're not really "testing" anything, Eric. You're just riding around at a sedate pace claiming to *know* something.
EricV said:
You have a misconception of long distance riding. It's far from all slab. It can be that for some, but it's not about that.
And you've always had a gross misconception about my riding, but that doesn't count, right?
EricV said:
Bottom line, I go places when I ride. I don't just ride the same group of roads in my local area.
So do I, Eric. I've ridden all over this country, too. You're not the only one to have ventured outside his own state. Perhaps I have not done the long-distance riding you have, but then I doubt you have the various racing experience I have, nor perhaps the wrenching experience, either. Does that suddenly make you *right* about all things about tires, and me "flat out wrong"?
I doubt it.
I ride because I enjoy it, both to go places when I ride, but also to explore my skill level and the engineering excellence of my mount. My riding is not just a means to get to "a place", but also to enjoy the road, almost as a melody, and the places along the way as lyrics... Both making the song of the ride itself. Best part is I get to be the songwriter, the musician, and the singer, too! I may tune my instrument differently than you, or even use a different one altogether, but that doesn't make my song any more "flat out wrong" than yours.
We may not like the same songs, but that doesn't mean we both aren't music lovers.
I'll leave you to your "elevator music", and I'll stick to my classic rock and roll.
Dallara
~