AlsoRan
Member
Excellent write up about the 2014 Super Tenere in this weeks Cycle News...
http://cyclenews.uberflip.com/i/295587
http://cyclenews.uberflip.com/i/295587
At least a few of us on here used to have an 800XC, myself included. You'll just have to take our word that the Super Tenere is everything that the 800 XC is and more. I can honestly tell you, I miss nothing about the Triumph, even though I enjoyed it greatly. The Yamaha is just a better bike all around. And I do believe, everything that the Triumph can do, the Yamaha can too.Nearly Normal said:I enjoyed the write up...I'm about to be in the market, and have to admit struggling some as I look to part with my Concours 1400 and replace it with the ST. I've looked recently at a Tiger, both the 800 XC and the Explorer. I'm sure the ST is a better off-road option than the Explorer which is important to me, but if one believes the press it's so 'ho-humm' that it's just a bigger version of a KLR....UGH. :-[ I can't tell You how much I don't want that! I loved the triples on my test rides, on-road...the 800 XC was nice, and while I'm assuming that it's relatively 'dirt-friendly', the chain drive is a deal breaker for me. The Explorer was a hoot, but I doubt that it has enough off-road ability, versatility...or dependability. I keep coming back to the Super Tenere...and am just hoping if I buy one, I'm not too bored, and regretting it. The article was one of the more optimistic write-ups I've seen...Now to get that Concours sold...
You definitely need to ride the S10. It's not a KLR, but it has some KLR'ish attributes that either can put you off or are endearing, depending on your POV.Nearly Normal said:I enjoyed the write up...I'm about to be in the market, and have to admit struggling some as I look to part with my Concours 1400 and replace it with the ST. I've looked recently at a Tiger, both the 800 XC and the Explorer. I'm sure the ST is a better off-road option than the Explorer which is important to me, but if one believes the press it's so 'ho-humm' that it's just a bigger version of a KLR....UGH. :-[ I can't tell You how much I don't want that! I loved the triples on my test rides, on-road...the 800 XC was nice, and while I'm assuming that it's relatively 'dirt-friendly', the chain drive is a deal breaker for me. The Explorer was a hoot, but I doubt that it has enough off-road ability, versatility...or dependability. I keep coming back to the Super Tenere...and am just hoping if I buy one, I'm not too bored, and regretting it. The article was one of the more optimistic write-ups I've seen...Now to get that Concours sold...
Well in that case an MT/FZ-09 based "Adventure Styled" bike makes more sense than an MT/FZ-07 based real Adventure bike I would say.YAMAHA research shows that 88 percent of Super Tenere owners use the bikes on road while only 12% venture off road.
Hey, it's good to be a 12%er, Cooler than a Harley rider these dayssnakebitten said:Gotta be more than 12%.
I wake up everyday to find I'm more a minority than I was the day before.
I AM a dinosaur. My kids have me pegged.
Thanks Mark...You're exactly right. I wasn't trying to offend the KLR nation out there, and certainly recognize it's value and popularity. Nor was I trying to hijack this thread...I just read the Cycle News article and thought it was upbeat and in fact DID make me want to go find one to ride again before I make a decision of what to buy. I'm a fan of the brand, and believe the ST has received an unfair smearing in the press at times. I joined this forum to learn more about the bike, and hopefully help me find one as the opportunity allows.markjenn said:You definitely need to ride the S10. It's not a KLR, but it has some KLR'ish attributes that either can put you off or are endearing, depending on your POV.
- Mark
When I said the S10 had some KLR'ish attributes, I was mainly referring to the engine which is a bit of a tractor and down on peak power compared to most of the competition. It's a very tractable powerplant with a broad powerband that is always useful, especially at low speeds in the dirt, but it has very little zing to it - it has a heavy crankshaft and its not especially enjoyable to rev. And the weight, like the KLR, is definitely always there - some magazines have likened the feel of the S10 to a powerful bike that is always carrying a lightweight passenger. But unlike the KLR, the chassis is very buttoned down and the bike, ridden within its modest cornering clearance limits, is a very good handler. It also feels very solid and "of one piece" unlike the KLR which always seemed to me to have a very budget-bike, flexy-flyer feel, especially the noodly front end and cheap suspension. You never get the feel the S10 is a budget bike - it is well put together, nicely finished, and has very high quality components.Nearly Normal said:As to my opinion regarding KLR's...here's an example. On a recent dual-sport ride in Arizona with some buddies, a friend and I swapped mounts for a bit...he took my XR650R, and I jumped on his KLR. His bike was loaded with pannards and included a big bore kit. Until I adjusted, I was taken by it's weight and lack of power...the noise with 'no go' and how low it was to the ground. I kept thinking, "This think feels like a small Road King..." By the time we swapped back, I was enjoying his bike, but was ready to get back on the XRR. I agree that the KLR is a very capable 'do it all' mount (Like the Tenere?..) but to me, it was pure boredom. The joy really is in the journey, not just the bike under you...but it's much sweeter when that bike puts a big smile on your face...just my .02 cents.
Thanks SPX...and Mark...and Snake. I know I probably sound like a ST/KLR hater and that not the case. My time on a ST consisted of a 10 minute, 5 mile street ride on a new bike from my local dealer, and the bike seemed great. I kept thinking..."This thing feels like a very big dirt bike." To me, that's a good thing. I just wish I could spend more time with one before I spend my money.SPX said:At least a few of us on here used to have an 800XC, myself included. You'll just have to take our word that the Super Tenere is everything that the 800 XC is and more. I can honestly tell you, I miss nothing about the Triumph, even though I enjoyed it greatly. The Yamaha is just a better bike all around. And I do believe, everything that the Triumph can do, the Yamaha can too.
Woah!...Snake, if You're talking to me, that's a really tempting offer...too bad we're so far apart. I follow what You're gettin' and am looking for something like that...a bike that can rack up the miles on road (it's miles and miles to anything here!), and a bike that's competent to take on unimproved roads...perhaps the rougher jeep trails (even an occasional single track???). Again, I appreciate the input...thanks Snake!...snakebitten said:You need to ride mine. Fly to Hobby airport. (Houston)
Take it for a day. Go explore. If you don't come back with a "I get it now. It's an F150 Raptor. Nice truck on and off road. Not a Land Rover on road and not a Jeep off. But very capable and comfortable at both."
Then you'll never be happy with it. You're GS desires won't be squelched.