avc8130 said:
What about the different configurations of your exhaust?
The TBR should have been wide open and compared to the LV with NO stinger/db killer. Fueling for that should have been close, no?
With the stinger in the LV I would think you would actually be a "tad" rich in most conditions. With the db killer in, you should be "super" rich. BTW: how is sound and loudness with these 2 options?
With the ECU in open loop from the ECU-U flash, I am not 100% sure what adjusting the CO does. Is the CO adjustment a "trim" for the open loop map? If so, your tuning is off and the canned tune just isn't that great. I know you say "something specific to my bike", but Jaxon saw it also on his customer's bike. The ECU-U flash with header/exhaust ran better with more fuel.
Of course both of you are poking around on the butt dyno, so there is great variance. However, FEEL is all that really matters. There are no dynos ripping up mountain passes.
ac
The ECU map is somewhat generic for a "slip on". The TBR was wide open, that's why it is in the garage waiting for me to decide to sell it.
The Leo with the stinger (db killer) in was decent, louder and less restrictive than stock, way more socially acceptable than the TBR. I have the disc in it right now, brings it down to near stock sound level, makes the can EU compliant. If someone was looking to knock off some weight and not get louder, that is the ticket. I am going to pull the disc out again, the sound was about right for me, and at steady state highway speed, sweet.
I don't know enough about electronic engine management to be more than dangerous. I don't know how the CO trims function with the flash. I do know they did have an impact on idle quality and off idle performance and part throttle operation.
If I get a burr up my tailpipe someday I may schedule a Friday appointment at AF1 and make a run down there and have it tuned on the Dyno. Wanna go ride that Texas Hill country anyhow.
