Chuck B said:
The other side of ES vs NON....If you plan on keeping it awhile the suspension will wear out. Most aftermarket suspension shops won't touch ES type suspension. I'd rather swap in aftermarket suspension in the beginning as you get suspension that performs better than the ES in all situations and is easy to service down the road. If you sell the bike you can simply return the bike to stock and sell the aftermarket components separately.
Chuck, you bring up a valid point.
I currently have Elka Shocks on my BMWGS and really like them. I do plan on keeping the Super T for a very long time. As I was discussing it with the wife, I told her that this will probably be the last NEW bike I will ever purchase so I am going all in on it. My farkle list is growing longer every day. ::015::
I know from the comments posted here and in some other threads, the ES is definitely not a bad option. It appears to work as expected, but in the back of my mind I was wondering about the long term durability of it.
I am leaning towards the ES, but after your post, I am now reconsidering it. I probably won't make my final decision until it is time to write the check. ::008::
I have been sitting here for several hours trying to figure out what engine guards, panniers, skid plate, shield and so on and so on. This much I have narrowed down. For the shield I will first go with Madstad. I have one of their shields on another bike of mine and I really like it. For the seat I will go with Baldwin, I also have one on another bike, and actually like it better than my Russell that I had on the same bike. As for the luggage rack, panniers and engine guards, I have no idea at this point.
Thanks