offcamber said:
I went with a Vololight
Doesn't rely on brake application to activate it.
http://vololights.com
Interesting. Although, I read their reasoning why the Vololights would be more reliable, and I must say I'm not sure I'm convinced. On the first scenario ("decelerating without braking") - I think that with such low rate of deceleration (e.g. downshifting) the situation would probably be much less risky than braking (if one lets another car sit so close on their six that a non-brake deceleration would risk hitting you, that's a different problem). Personally, when I slow down, I always tap the brakes (to alert the driver behind me AND make sure brakes are functional). On the 2nd scenario (different rate of alert between a "tap" and a "full brakes" squeeze) - why would a driver ignoring any other solution's high-frequency flashing brake lights act any differently to Vololights flashing?
Also, I'm not sure how their technology works. The fact they require "calibration" is a concern for me. What happens if/when the device gets out of calibration (solutions connected in-line with the brake light seem to have less chance of failure)? Why is a magnet being used for calibration (does that mean the product uses magnets and if so - would those interfere in any way with the ABS - the user manual specifically warns against getting magnets close to the bike for that reason)?
I'm really not trying to diss the product (I think the concept is very interesting), just wondering if it really does have any benefit over the simple, line-in brake light solutions, which are priced at 1/2 (SupaBrake) or 1/4 (BackoffXP) of it. Just my 2cents.
Am I missing anything?
Shaq