Speed difference from Gen 1 to Gen 2

raven6116

New Member
Joined
May 8, 2023
Messages
6
Location
Bay Area California
Hi All,
I have a general question: On my Gen 1 I would get 20MPH / 1000 rpm so at 3000rpm I got 60MPH and 4000rpm produced 80MPH. On my new 2022 I only get 70MPH @ 4000rpm. Is this something you've noticed too? The new bike is Californian the old bike was not, so I', wondering if the California Canister is having an effect. I'll get the canister off and reflash the bike as soon as I can, but I'm curious if there is a difference Gen1 - Gen 2

thanks in advance, Be safe
 

Sierra1

Well-Known Member
Joined
Nov 7, 2016
Messages
15,029
Location
Joshua TX
. . . . On my new 2022 I only get 70MPH @ 4000rpm. . . .
My '17 does about 73mph at 4k. Some days it's 3900, some days it's 4k. 74mph is always 4k. Since I've noticed this while on cruise, I've assumed that it has to do with environmental conditions. Like if I have a tail wind, are the rpms lower than if I have a headwind? Slight grade up or down?

But yes, other have noted that the Gen 1 speedo is not as accurate as the Gen 2. I wouldn't worry about it though.
 

Boris

Well-Known Member
Joined
Dec 21, 2013
Messages
2,098
Location
midlands. UK
I agree that speedo error between gen models likely play a part. Mine shows a little under 80mph at 4K, however I know from two sat navs that it’s about 5-6 mph optimistic.
 

Sierra1

Well-Known Member
Joined
Nov 7, 2016
Messages
15,029
Location
Joshua TX
I agree that speedo error between gen models likely play a part. Mine shows a little under 80mph at 4K, however I know from two sat navs that it’s about 5-6 mph optimistic.
Which mine, for whatever reason(s), is pretty much right on? See? The one perfect Super Tenere. :D
 

gapmtn1

Active Member
Joined
Oct 30, 2020
Messages
184
Location
Blacksburg, VA
On my Gen 1 I would get 20MPH / 1000 rpm so at 3000rpm I got 60MPH and 4000rpm produced 80MPH. On my new 2022 I only get 70MPH @ 4000rpm. Is this something you've noticed too? The new bike is Californian the old bike was not, so I', wondering if the California Canister is having an effect. I'll get the canister off and reflash the bike as soon as I can
Aside from a slipping clutch, the only thing that would affect these numbers is gearing. No canister version or reflash will change what speed your bike travels at for a given RPM.

Edit: Tire size (actual circumference) will also change speed:RPM ratio.
 
Last edited:

magic

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jul 6, 2015
Messages
751
Location
WISCONSIN
Aside from a slipping clutch, the only thing that would affect these numbers is gearing. No canister version or reflash will change what speed your bike travels at for a given RPM.

Edit: Tire size (actual circumference) will also change speed:RPM ratio.
Also hills or wind will not affect speed at a given rpm.
 

Jlq1969

Well-Known Member
Joined
May 5, 2018
Messages
1,805
Location
Argentina
Tire size (actual circumference) will also change speed:RPM ratio.
The tire diameter affects the RPM/true speed (GPS) relationship……but he refers to the RPM/speedometer relationship…..that is not affected by the diameter of the tire
 

gapmtn1

Active Member
Joined
Oct 30, 2020
Messages
184
Location
Blacksburg, VA
The tire diameter affects the RPM/true speed (GPS) relationship……but he refers to the RPM/speedometer relationship…..that is not affected by the diameter of the tire
Raven never mentions speedometer. Nor did I.
But thanks.
 

Sierra1

Well-Known Member
Joined
Nov 7, 2016
Messages
15,029
Location
Joshua TX
Also hills or wind will not affect speed at a given rpm.
I will respectfully have to disagree with that. I can't prove/show it on paper, but I know what I see my bike doing. It a very small amount, and there's no way to know how many rpms different because each tick is 100rpms. But, on cruise, my tach will change from 3,900 - 4,000rpm depending on grade and wind. Speed might change by 1mph, or not.
 

gapmtn1

Active Member
Joined
Oct 30, 2020
Messages
184
Location
Blacksburg, VA
Also hills or wind will not affect speed at a given rpm.
I will respectfully have to disagree with that.
With a properly working standard manual transmission and clutch, no tire slippage, etc.... this is just not true. There is no slop in the system. This is not your cage with automatic transmission and torque converter. Hard unforgiving manual transmission gears aren't going to flex and give with hills. The shaft drive (same is true for chain drive), u-joints, splines, even the black rubber blocks in your wheels aren't going to allow the loss or gain of speed at a given RPM. It's a mathematical consistency. With your history, Sierra, you should know that.

My '17 does about 73mph at 4k. Some days it's 3900, some days it's 4k
Now, Sierra, you do bring up the gauges. I suggest that the differences you see are a result of the limits of the gauges' accuracy. As you mention, the tachometer display is accurate +- 100 RPMs. The speedometer display is accurate +- 1 MPH. Assuming the speedometer does normal rounding, perhaps on an incline you go from 73.4 MPH (73 indicated) and 4000 RPMs down to 72.5 MPH (still 73 indicated) and this brings the revs down enough for the tachometer to visually tick down to 3900. Same displayed speed but different RPMs. Mechanically your speed:RPM ratio will (and must) stay the same, but the gauges are telling partial truths.

I have yet to own a Japanese with an accurate speedometer; using them for comparisons sake is pointless. I wouldn't really put a ton of stock in the tachometer, either, if I were a real tuner.
 
Top