colorider said:
You still did not answer my question (the one you quoted). Here it is again:
"Based on what? How can you determine if the accident would not have been avoided had the rider been MORE visible?
I'll quote myself then, because you obviously missed my post...
ErnsTT said:
If Hi-Viz would really help, they would not end on a stretcher,
Just look at the Policebikers getting run over, how hgh-viz cn you get, here in the netherlands, a cop parked his bike so traffic would not hit another axident, and the oncoming car ran him over even though his bike had blue-light flashing...
So perhaps my "end up on a stretcher" was not graphic enough, my knowledge comes from accident data, in Europe there is growing awarenes, the only way to do something about accidents te first thing to do is collect Accident data, to check if accepted beliefs about measures *really* work.
So wear as much bells and whistles as you like, but don't think it helps much, and be aware it is a bit like homeopathic medicine, it works, but only in certain circumstances, and it can't cure texting cagers.
Well its been said enough, its no use to go further, or we should start a new thread about safety measures, okay?
Its about LED taillights, and like so many a thing of brilliance of the S10, it allready has a Led Taillight, its a really fast one too, its the same as on the R6